The best way to learn chess is to play a lot: practice, practice and practice. There are two common mistakes that beginners make regarding chess:
Online chess has not followed the time honored tradition of Chess. Many chess games on the internet are 5 minute 0 increment crapfests played between idiots who think that the objective of the game is to move the pieces in less time without being checkmated.
Ooops! Did i just say that? The online morons practically invented this chess variant - Crappy Blitz, not to be confused with the blitz chess played by good players. (Note too that good players would be ashamed of winning on time with a severe material deficit) They might take the win, but this is the reason for the popularity of incremental clocks that would prevent this from happening..
These kids have a perverse mastery of moving pieces in less time, yet display a complete lack of rudimentary chess skill. Unfortunately, it is simply not enough of a chess deficit to let you checkmate them in 5 minutes!. These are the same morons who excel at 5/0 but cannot play a 1 minute 6second inc game (it is much faster than 5/0 if less than 40 moves!).
The reason being if they are down in material in the latter they will lose because the opp will always have 6 seconds to make a move. And if he is almost out of time, he can resort to checking to get some extra time. IN a 5/0 time you cannot do this and will lose no matter what despite being the superior player!
Note on GM bullet chess: High rated players do dabble in this, mostly to improve their reflexes and show off their ability to finish the game in the time allotted. Most GMs could defeat an average club player even if they just had 1minute total for the whole game while the other player had say 40 minutes!
So you would expect that the majority of the players playing bullet chess to be great players -right? Wrong. They are morons, complete frigging morons. DO NOT PLAY BULLET CHESS ONLINE. You would be a fool for thinking it will help you.
So the best advice to those who want to improve their skills: do not play blitz!
Regarding a comment below:
Playing speed chess might improve your time management skills and help you to think faster for a given situation, but it is a poor substitute for longer games. Playing Blitz should be supplemented by longer games.
Carlsen and Nakamura play longer games too.
In any case, this post was mostly a rant about players "stuck" at some rating unable to improve and whose games are made up entirely of 1/0 2/0 timed atrocities won on time.
All they do is play fast - they actually feel they are better than the player they beat on time even if the opponent is up by a queen. In reality they are just better at beating the clock than their opponent. Many of the players they beat on time will demolish them in a longer game. That was my point, obviously it does not apply to players in the caliber of Carlsen.
|
If you would like to email the chess variant inventor directly: inventor@chess.computerwebservices.net
|
|
Posted by: Der Bos on 2010-06-19 05:53:03 Like Chess: YES Even though the author of this article seems to lack etiquette on the web he says exactly what I learned the hard ways and, of course, independently of his rant: 1. (Zombie-like) learning opening moves did not improve my chess play. 2. Blitzing did not improve my chess play. And I think I know why: When blitzing, I am always just happy to not blunder, every move, then I think of the next move, I'm happy not to have blundered again (in the best case) etc. but I never understand the position because there's just no time! Furthermore, I don't analyze the games afterwards. I can just go through the played moves (which were crappy most of the way) and never know what the accurate moves were, unless I load the position into a program - which is more tedious than just taking the next "hit" in form of another blitz game. They say that improvement requires training and playing many many games - I did that (blitzing) and was really disappointed to see that my rating just did not improve after several thousand games! What did improve my play (a little bit) was analyzing games with the computer and watching chess videos. Conclusion: Blitzing is really addictive and did not get me anywhere, chess-wise. It's useful for quickly checking one's skills though. Posted by: IC on 2010-06-11 14:35:21 Like Chess: YES I sense a very angry player who lost lots of games to lower rated opponents... Come on, don't come and QQ about blitz chess making your skills worse and blahblah... Don't tell me, that in a blitz game you can't beat a 200 elo-points lower opponent (if that's his true playing skill). Even if your reflexes are rusty dude. If you fail to come up with a wining plan/calculate tactics (and so on) fast enough, then it's your problem not the opponents. You have to prove that you're better and work out the position as fast as possible. Now I think, that you have another problem, you got the advantage, but could not bring the game to the win and lost your time trying. That's a matter of technique! You then better go and exercise that first before complaining. And when you are "one with the technique" then head back. remember: Blitz is the best way to measure talent. (And that was not told by me, but by the world toc chess trainers) IC, currently Berlin's under 18 best blitz player Posted by: ac vs dc on 2010-06-08 23:19:21 Like Chess: YES I strongly disagree. Blitz is a great way for players, especially developing players, to see a variety of tactics in a short period of time. It is not a substitute for a longer game, but a way to make your longer game better. Chess is all about thought and the amount of it you can do within an allocated time. Blitz forces you to think faster and that ability enables you to think more during the longer game. Granted it doesn't help you think deeper, but it also doesn't hurt. 5+0 is also a great way to learn or revise opening theory. See something you haven't seen before? Look it up before your next game. If it's rubbish you'll know how to punish it next time. My online stats: of my 1+0 games 73% resulted in checkmate or resignation. Your time theory is flawed and unreferenced. Please clean up your language if you are going to write articles like this. Posted by: Ranz on 2010-03-31 18:30:22 Like Chess: YES Blitz is just for fun. It promotes shallow thinking because players are always concern about the thinking time...not the thinking lines. I tried playing blitz games with my friends whom I always beat in long games.. Ouch!!! they could beat me easily on 5 min blitz game. I pity them because they don't learn the real way of learning chess the proper way. Posted by: chesscomfortable on 2010-02-19 09:09:57 Like Chess: YES thanks for liberating me from online chess addicion... Posted by: Grumil on 2010-02-03 06:56:12 Like Chess: YES Ja igram na Playchess -u.Na internetu je nemoguce igrati partije koje su duze od 5 minuta.Zasto ? Zbog citera koji mogu da povlace poteze sa drugog racunara ili njih vise igra protiv vas pa se konsultuju.Posto Playchess ima Taskswich controlu,kada igrate do 5 min partije,a neko cituje gubi na vreme.Ja sam dobio tako puno izgubljenih partija na vreme protiv citera.Jak igrac igra jako i blitz i spore partije.Jedino je citer jak u sporim partijama a slab u blitzu i bullitu.Iskusan igrac koji je dugo igrao sah u klubovima lako otkriva da li je njegov protivnik igrac ili kompjuter ili kada neko jaci igra umesto vas.(text in SerboCroatian language) Posted by: Mauro on 2010-01-20 09:18:36 Like Chess: YES I couldn't agree more. Posted by: BLITZ CHESS RULE on 2009-12-25 13:47:15 Like Chess: YES I DO HAVE A BUNCH OF CRAPY...."SERIOUS CHESS PLAYERS FRIENDS".........CRYING ALL THE TIME....BLITZ IS NOT CHESS....BLITZ IS...SUCH AND SUCH....BUT THE TRUE IS .......BLITZ IS MORE EXCIMENT TO PLAY THAN THOSE "LONG TERM AND BORING "HIGH QUALITY GAMES"......IN 5 MIN...GAMES...YOU WILL FIND ALL KIND OF GOOD AND BAD STUFF....AND THE MOST IMPORTANT...YOU WILL FIND YOU CAN PLAY HIGH QUALITY CHESS...IF YOU FORCE YOURSELF TO PLAY....GOOD....."TACTIS IS THE WAY TO GO"......COWARDS DOES NOT LIKE BLITZ.....BECAUSE THEY CAN NOT GET HIDDEN BEHIND THE WALL....TO PLAY THEIR "POSSITIONAL CHESS"...BLITZ FORCES YOU TO PLAY AGGRESSIVE AND CREATIVE....IN A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME.... Posted by: seagull1756 on 2009-10-22 10:19:03 Like Chess: YES Why so much hysterical ranting? For Tal it was good, for Botvinnik it wasn't, some players just play stupid moves to win on time, some actually come up with something creative, and nobody is denying that long games are more profound. And by the way, if you like using the word "idiot" so much, let me remind you what William Blake said: "to generalize is to be an idiot". Easy, tiger! Posted by: Dave on 2009-09-29 11:50:53 Like Chess: YES If speed is so important, then computers are the best, the weakest computer can destroy the best human player in less than 10 minutes. Speed is not skill stupid blitz fans. Posted by: Chessmaniac on 2009-09-29 11:48:04 Like Chess: YES If blitz chess was any good it would replace proper chess in tournaments. Why sitting at the chessboard for 5 hours or so when you can finish the game in 10 minutes or less. May be we should start playing 10 minute football, basketball or baseball on the same logic. Posted by: karpov2000 on 2009-09-29 11:45:26 Like Chess: YES Those who think blitz chess is chess need to give up this game and take up poker or other rubbish games. Posted by: frantz on 2009-09-29 11:41:59 Like Chess: YES You can improve your chess through blitz but only your blitz chess not your proper chess. I know of a player who can beat 2000 ELO players at blitz over 80% of times but his own ELO rating is 1300. He has learned how to play good blitz through practice but not good chess. Posted by: nidgye on 2009-09-29 11:38:59 Like Chess: YES I used to play blitz chess because to me the only thing that mattered was winning and as chance played the biggest role in the result I really enjoyed it a lot. Actually blitz chess is not much different from card game where luck rules supreme. Posted by: master000 on 2009-09-29 11:36:06 Like Chess: YES Only fools take blitz chess seriously. Posted by: vaganian on 2009-09-29 11:35:24 Like Chess: YES I agree that blitz chess is not chess but it's a good way to relax when you feel tired or stressed. Posted by: kevin on 2009-09-29 11:33:45 Like Chess: YES Blitz chess does neither need memory or strategic thinking, actually it's for those who lack talent and deep thinking, however, like backgammons it's a good way to kill time. Posted by: zukertort on 2009-09-29 11:30:27 Like Chess: YES You are absolutely right, blitz chess does deteriorate one's skills. Those who lose their interest in chess, can no longer concentrate and have failed improve their chess resort to blitz chess. Their logic is: if they win that's because they have talent and if they lose that's because of time limits. Best thing would be for FIDE to abolish blitz chess from tournaments altogether. Botvinnik asserted that blitz chess is not chess but bauble play. Posted by: Calamity on 2009-09-10 12:00:21 Like Chess: YES I can see you feel very strongly about how much you hate Blitz/Bullet Chess, It's actually good to play, but only for experienced players and reflexes, If you're new to Chess it's almost impossible to beat someone who knows what they're doing and has quick thinking, So you'd just get discouraged from playing, It's also pretty boring and repetitive with memorizing strategies that don't vary much. Long Chess takes skill. Blitz Chess takes memory. ;) Posted by: michael reyes on 2009-07-18 20:20:24 Like Chess: YES I utterly disagree with your views on bullet and blitz chess. In my case, these have actually improved my OTB play. Your views are likened to those of the likes of Botvinnik or the other old masters who sees speed chess as sacrilege to their game of chess. Modern players like grischuk, carlsen, nakamura and morozevich play blitz. Even older generation players like dreev play blitz very often. Posted by: JAcob on 2009-07-08 17:33:17 Like Chess: YES IT's sexual Posted by: SirLucario on 2009-03-03 07:09:57 Like Chess: YES pfft, I play more blitz than anything, and my OTB play has actually improved. One must be able to restrain themselves from blitzing moves in standard time controls. That's all. Posted by: master class player on 2009-02-26 12:56:26 bullet chess dos have different strategy and tactics Posted by: Master Class player on 2009-02-26 12:54:21 1m 6 second inc is shorter than 5 min ? 5m= 300 seconds for each side 600 seconds for both side 1m =60 seconds 120 for both sides plus 6x2=12 inc x 40 moves= 480 480 =+120= 600 it is same time actualy Posted by: uk on 2008-12-19 04:21:55 Like Chess: YES blitz wont help in improvinf chess Posted by: Yanko on 2008-10-12 02:44:20 Like Chess: YES I agree with your general characterization. In fact, anything less than 5 0 does not even deserve to be called chess. 5 0 itself is a joke as far as chess goes. Posted by: chessboy1 on 2008-07-13 11:19:27 Like Chess: YES gli scacchi sono un gioco,anzi pi che un gioco un'arte nel quale bisogna dar libero sfogo alla propria fantasia,alla creativita e soprattutto non lasciarsi mai intimorire. negli scacchi un individuo impara a prevedere i propri errori e a non commetterli una seconda volta e questo e anche un significativo aspetto che riscontriamo un diversi modi anche nella vita stessa! io attraverso gli scacchi ho imparato a temprare il mio carattere,perche non si puo diventere un grande maestro s non si impara a conoscere i propri errori (text in ITALIAN language) Posted by: chessvariant Inventor on 2008-04-20 18:56:54 No, it is not the same as even a 2 min 12second increment timer. In fact, I suspect you are exactly the type of moron I am talking about. It is a great way to have fun, and perhaps improve your reflexes but it does not improve your chess. Have you even played longer time controls? - Idiot! Posted by: Mike on 2008-04-20 04:10:37 Like Chess: YES Bullet chess is exactly the same as any other chess. You obviously cannot play it well, this is why you down it. Posted by: Kid poker on 2007-09-05 15:20:29 Like Chess: YES Damn WSOP and online poker ... no more bullet chess for the kiddies! Posted by: Kid Poker on 2007-09-05 15:17:28 Like Chess: YES
Those pesky kids ... poker or chess all the time! |